WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsEnergous Corporation (WATT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 25443% more annual revenue ($1.44B vs $5.63M). SONO leads profitability with a -1.2% profit margin vs -170.4%. SONO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 42/100 (D).

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0

WATT

Avoid

21

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 8.0Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -154.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOUndervalued (+42.1%)

Margin of Safety

+42.1%

Fair Value

$28.49

Current Price

$14.84

$13.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $28.49Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WATT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

WATT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
610.0%10/10

Revenue surging 610.0% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.1010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.2%1/10

Currently unprofitable

WATT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$181.21M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-168.0%2/10

ROE of -168.0% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : WATT

The strongest argument for WATT centers on Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 610.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WATT

The primary concerns for WATT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a turnaround stock while WATT is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

WATT is growing revenue faster at 610.0% — sustainability is the question.

SONO generates stronger free cash flow (157M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONO scores higher overall (42/100 vs 21/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Energous Corporation

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Energous Corporation develops wireless charging solutions. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?