WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 789% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $1.46B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 1.6%. WDS trades at a lower P/E of 15.4x. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 5.7Quality: 5.0

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 8.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOUndervalued (+43.7%)

Margin of Safety

+43.7%

Fair Value

$29.31

Current Price

$15.06

$14.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $29.31Overvalued
WDSUndervalued (+31.5%)

Margin of Safety

+31.5%

Fair Value

$27.39

Current Price

$21.57

$5.82 discount

UndervaluedFair: $27.39Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
15.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.77B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
87.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 87.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. SONO offers better value entry with a 43.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?