WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 22423% more annual revenue ($323.90B vs $1.44B). XOM leads profitability with a 8.9% profit margin vs -122.0%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

XOM

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONO.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-247.2%)

Margin of Safety

-247.2%

Fair Value

$45.56

Current Price

$159.67

$114.11 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

XOM5 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$661.72B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.279/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.23B8/10

Generating 5.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.63B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-90.0%2/10

Revenue declined 90.0%

Profit MarginProfitability
-122.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

XOM4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.054/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-130.0%2/10

Revenue declined 130.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a turnaround stock while XOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at -90.0% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (5.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (44/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?