WallStSmart

Sonos Inc (SONO)vsZoom Video Communications Inc (ZM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Zoom Video Communications Inc generates 238% more annual revenue ($4.93B vs $1.46B). ZM leads profitability with a 42.0% profit margin vs 1.6%. ZM trades at a lower P/E of 13.8x. ZM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

SONO

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.0Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.04

ZM

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 8.5Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.79
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SONOSignificantly Overvalued (-34.6%)

Margin of Safety

-34.6%

Fair Value

$12.26

Current Price

$15.08

$2.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $12.26Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ZM.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SONO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.159/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZM6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
42.0%10/10

Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
74.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 74.2% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.7910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
20.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
13.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.88B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.2%3/10

ROE of 6.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZM1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.212/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : ZM

The strongest argument for ZM centers on Profit Margin, EPS Growth, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 42.0% and operating margin at 25.1%.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 92.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : ZM

The primary concerns for ZM are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SONO profiles as a value stock while ZM is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.94 — expect wider price swings.

SONO is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

ZM generates stronger free cash flow (500M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ZM scores higher overall (70/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 42.0% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Zoom Video Communications Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. provides a premier video communications platform in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?