WallStSmart

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)vsSuzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR (SUZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR generates 835% more annual revenue ($49.53B vs $5.30B). SUZ leads profitability with a 23.0% profit margin vs 15.4%. SUZ trades at a lower P/E of 4.6x. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

SQM

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.04

SUZ

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.11
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SQM.

SUZUndervalued (+50.8%)

Margin of Safety

+50.8%

Fair Value

$22.71

Current Price

$8.18

$14.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $22.71Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3410/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
41.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.8%10/10

Revenue surging 69.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
165.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 165.2% YoY

SUZ4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
23.0%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

SUZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.1%2/10

Revenue declined 5.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-31.9%2/10

Earnings declined 31.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-101.68M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.112/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on PEG Ratio, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 41.1%. Revenue growth of 69.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SUZ

The strongest argument for SUZ centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.0% and operating margin at 16.7%.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : SUZ

The primary concerns for SUZ are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 2.03 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SQM profiles as a growth stock while SUZ is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

SQM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 69.8% — sustainability is the question.

SQM generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (74/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 15.4% margins and 69.8% revenue growth. SUZ offers better value entry with a 50.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Suzano Papel e Celulose SA ADR

BASIC MATERIALS · PAPER & PAPER PRODUCTS · USA

Suzano SA produces and sells eucalyptus pulp and paper products in Brazil and internationally. The company is headquartered in Salvador, Brazil.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?