WallStSmart

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B (SQM)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trane Technologies plc generates 372% more annual revenue ($21.60B vs $4.58B). TT leads profitability with a 13.4% profit margin vs 12.9%. SQM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.59. SQM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

SQM

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 6.0Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.01

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

SQMUndervalued (+9.0%)

Margin of Safety

+9.0%

Fair Value

$82.67

Current Price

$93.46

$10.79 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.67Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

SQM4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
52.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 52.3% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.598/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
28.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Market CapQuality
$107.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

SQM1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
45.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
12.6x4/10

Trading at 12.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : SQM

The strongest argument for SQM centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.59 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : SQM

The primary concerns for SQM are P/E Ratio. A P/E of 45.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SQM profiles as a growth stock while TT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

SQM is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

TT generates stronger free cash flow (542M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SQM scores higher overall (66/100 vs 52/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA ADR B

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

Sociedad Qumica y Minera de Chile SA produces and distributes specialty plant nutrients, iodine and its derivatives, lithium and its derivatives, potassium chloride and sulfate, industrial chemicals and other products and services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?