WallStSmart

AT&T Inc. (T)vsWaters Corporation (WAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AT&T Inc. generates 3256% more annual revenue ($126.53B vs $3.77B). T leads profitability with a 16.9% profit margin vs 11.9%. WAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. T earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

T

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0

WAT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 3.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

TUndervalued (+21.5%)

Margin of Safety

+21.5%

Fair Value

$32.17

Current Price

$25.16

$7.01 discount

UndervaluedFair: $32.17Overvalued
WATSignificantly Overvalued (-63.1%)

Margin of Safety

-63.1%

Fair Value

$201.83

Current Price

$355.13

$153.30 premium

UndervaluedFair: $201.83Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

T5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Market CapQuality
$175.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.7%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.68B8/10

Generating 2.7B in free cash flow

WAT2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
91.5%10/10

Revenue surging 91.5% year-over-year

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.9210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

T3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.814/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.9%4/10

2.9% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Earnings declined 11.3%

WAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.3x4/10

Trading at 8.3x book value

Return on EquityProfitability
5.2%3/10

ROE of 5.2% — below average capital efficiency

P/E RatioValuation
44.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : T

The strongest argument for T centers on P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.9% and operating margin at 22.7%.

Bull Case : WAT

The strongest argument for WAT centers on Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 91.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : T

The primary concerns for T are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : WAT

The primary concerns for WAT are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. A P/E of 44.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

T profiles as a value stock while WAT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.14 — expect wider price swings.

WAT is growing revenue faster at 91.5% — sustainability is the question.

T generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

T scores higher overall (64/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 16.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AT&T Inc.

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

AT&T Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate holding company, Delaware-registered but headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world largest telecommunications company, and the second largest provider of mobile telephone services.

Waters Corporation

HEALTHCARE · DIAGNOSTICS & RESEARCH · USA

Waters Corporation is a publicly traded Analytical Laboratory instrument and software company headquartered in Milford, Massachusetts.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?