WallStSmart

Trane Technologies plc (TT)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 149% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $21.60B). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs 13.4%. TT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.01. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.77

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

UBERFair Value (-2.8%)

Margin of Safety

-2.8%

Fair Value

$71.28

Current Price

$72.21

$0.93 premium

UndervaluedFair: $71.28Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Market CapQuality
$104.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
34.5%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$148.29B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.912/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

TT profiles as a value stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?