WallStSmart

WPP PLC ADR (WPP)vsZiff Davis Inc (ZD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

WPP PLC ADR generates 834% more annual revenue ($13.55B vs $1.45B). ZD leads profitability with a 3.3% profit margin vs -1.6%. ZD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.53. ZD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

WPP

Avoid

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 4.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.73

ZD

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.70
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WPP.

ZDSignificantly Overvalued (-305.9%)

Margin of Safety

-305.9%

Fair Value

$7.75

Current Price

$43.46

$35.71 premium

UndervaluedFair: $7.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

WPP1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.71B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

ZD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.2%

Areas to Watch

WPP4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.2%3/10

Operating margin of 2.2%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.232/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.3%2/10

ROE of -5.3% — below average capital efficiency

ZD4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
38.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.704/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.72B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : WPP

The strongest argument for WPP centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : ZD

The strongest argument for ZD centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WPP

The primary concerns for WPP are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.13 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ZD

The primary concerns for ZD are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WPP profiles as a turnaround stock while ZD is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

WPP is growing revenue faster at -8.3% — sustainability is the question.

WPP generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ZD scores higher overall (51/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

WPP PLC ADR

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

WPP plc, a creative transformation company, provides communications, expertise, trade and technology services in North America, the UK, Western Continental Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and Eastern Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Visit Website →

Ziff Davis Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

J2 Global, Inc. provides Internet services worldwide. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?