WallStSmart

Abbott Laboratories (ABT)vsDiamondback Energy Inc (FANG)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Abbott Laboratories generates 210% more annual revenue ($44.33B vs $14.29B). ABT leads profitability with a 14.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. ABT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.52. ABT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

ABT

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABTSignificantly Overvalued (-315.5%)

Margin of Safety

-315.5%

Fair Value

$25.23

Current Price

$104.83

$79.60 premium

UndervaluedFair: $25.23Overvalued
FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABT3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$180.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
21.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.6%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.63B8/10

Generating 2.6B in free cash flow

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ABT4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
28.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABT

The strongest argument for ABT centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : ABT

The primary concerns for ABT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABT profiles as a value stock while FANG is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ABT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.74 — expect wider price swings.

ABT is growing revenue faster at 4.4% — sustainability is the question.

ABT generates stronger free cash flow (2.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ABT scores higher overall (51/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abbott Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Abbott Laboratories is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois, United States. The company was founded by Chicago physician Wallace Calvin Abbott in 1888 to formulate known drugs; today, it sells medical devices, diagnostics, branded generic medicines and nutritional products. It split off its research-based pharmaceuticals business into AbbVie in 2013.

Visit Website →

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?