WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMedtronic PLC (MDT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Medtronic PLC generates 145% more annual revenue ($35.48B vs $14.47B). MDT leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 2.0%. MDT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.36. MDT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MDT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued
MDTUndervalued (+27.7%)

Margin of Safety

+27.7%

Fair Value

$107.79

Current Price

$76.15

$31.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $107.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

MDT4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$100.09B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MDT1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.8%2/10

Earnings declined 11.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : MDT

The strongest argument for MDT centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : MDT

The primary concerns for MDT are EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MDT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.63 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

MDT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MDT scores higher overall (58/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Medtronic PLC

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Medtronic plc is an American-Irish registered medical device company that primarily operates in the United States. Medtronic has an operational and executive headquarters in Fridley, Minnesota in the US.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?