WallStSmart

Abbott Laboratories (ABT)vsGlobus Medical (GMED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Abbott Laboratories generates 1381% more annual revenue ($46.59B vs $3.14B). GMED leads profitability with a 17.0% profit margin vs 11.7%. GMED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. GMED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

ABT

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.71

GMED

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 9.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 5.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ABTSignificantly Overvalued (-37.5%)

Margin of Safety

-37.5%

Fair Value

$74.13

Current Price

$103.09

$28.97 premium

UndervaluedFair: $74.13Overvalued
GMEDUndervalued (+37.2%)

Margin of Safety

+37.2%

Fair Value

$140.62

Current Price

$74.19

$66.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $140.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ABT2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$176.41B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.09B8/10

Generating 2.1B in free cash flow

GMED4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.4310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.8%

Areas to Watch

ABT3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-47.5%2/10

Earnings declined 47.5%

GMED2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.2%2/10

Earnings declined 26.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ABT

The strongest argument for ABT centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 13.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GMED

The strongest argument for GMED centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.0% and operating margin at 24.8%.

Bear Case : ABT

The primary concerns for ABT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : GMED

The primary concerns for GMED are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ABT profiles as a value stock while GMED is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

GMED carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

ABT is growing revenue faster at 13.0% — sustainability is the question.

ABT generates stronger free cash flow (2.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GMED scores higher overall (60/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 17.0% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Abbott Laboratories

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Abbott Laboratories is an American multinational medical devices and health care company with headquarters in Abbott Park, Illinois, United States. The company was founded by Chicago physician Wallace Calvin Abbott in 1888 to formulate known drugs; today, it sells medical devices, diagnostics, branded generic medicines and nutritional products. It split off its research-based pharmaceuticals business into AbbVie in 2013.

Visit Website →

Globus Medical

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Globus Medical, Inc., a medical device company, develops and markets healthcare solutions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The company is headquartered in Audubon, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?