WallStSmart

Edwards Lifesciences Corp (EW)vsGlobus Medical (GMED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Edwards Lifesciences Corp generates 107% more annual revenue ($6.51B vs $3.14B). GMED leads profitability with a 17.0% profit margin vs 15.4%. GMED appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.73. GMED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

EW

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.48

GMED

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 6.7Quality: 9.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 5.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

EWUndervalued (+68.9%)

Margin of Safety

+68.9%

Fair Value

$254.99

Current Price

$84.37

$170.62 discount

UndervaluedFair: $254.99Overvalued
GMEDUndervalued (+37.2%)

Margin of Safety

+37.2%

Fair Value

$140.62

Current Price

$74.19

$66.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $140.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EW3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0710/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.4810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
29.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.8%

GMED4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.4310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.8%

Areas to Watch

EW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.924/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
51.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-25.4%2/10

Earnings declined 25.4%

GMED2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.734/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-26.2%2/10

Earnings declined 26.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EW

The strongest argument for EW centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 29.8%. Revenue growth of 13.6% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GMED

The strongest argument for GMED centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.0% and operating margin at 24.8%.

Bear Case : EW

The primary concerns for EW are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 51.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : GMED

The primary concerns for GMED are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GMED carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

EW is growing revenue faster at 13.6% — sustainability is the question.

EW generates stronger free cash flow (585M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MEDICAL DEVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GMED scores higher overall (60/100 vs 55/100), backed by strong 17.0% margins. EW offers better value entry with a 68.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edwards Lifesciences Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Edwards Lifesciences is an American medical technology company headquartered in Irvine, California, specializing in artificial heart valves and hemodynamic monitoring.

Visit Website →

Globus Medical

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DEVICES · USA

Globus Medical, Inc., a medical device company, develops and markets healthcare solutions for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The company is headquartered in Audubon, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?