WallStSmart

Arcosa Inc (ACA)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 936% more annual revenue ($30.12B vs $2.91B). ACA leads profitability with a 7.7% profit margin vs 3.7%. PWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.90. PWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

ACA

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.94

PWR

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 2.13

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PWR4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$105.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

ACA4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.904/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACA

The strongest argument for ACA centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACA

The primary concerns for ACA are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 97.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACA profiles as a value stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

PWR is growing revenue faster at 26.3% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (172M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PWR scores higher overall (56/100 vs 53/100) and 26.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arcosa Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Arcosa, Inc. provides infrastructure related products and solutions for the construction, energy and transportation markets in North America. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?