WallStSmart

Arcosa Inc (ACA)vsMasTec Inc (MTZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

MasTec Inc generates 426% more annual revenue ($15.28B vs $2.91B). ACA leads profitability with a 7.7% profit margin vs 3.0%. MTZ appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.64. MTZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

ACA

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.94

MTZ

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.43

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACA2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MTZ2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
34.5%10/10

Revenue surging 34.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
508.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 508.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

ACA4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.0x4/10

Moderate valuation

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

MTZ4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.644/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
8.6x4/10

Trading at 8.6x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.0%3/10

3.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACA

The strongest argument for ACA centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : MTZ

The strongest argument for MTZ centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 34.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : ACA

The primary concerns for ACA are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : MTZ

The primary concerns for MTZ are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 63.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACA profiles as a value stock while MTZ is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

MTZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.79 — expect wider price swings.

MTZ is growing revenue faster at 34.5% — sustainability is the question.

ACA generates stronger free cash flow (28M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MTZ scores higher overall (63/100 vs 53/100) and 34.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Arcosa Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Arcosa, Inc. provides infrastructure related products and solutions for the construction, energy and transportation markets in North America. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

Visit Website →

MasTec Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

MasTec, Inc., an infrastructure construction company, provides engineering, construction, installation, maintenance, and upgrade services for communications, energy, utilities, and other infrastructure primarily in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?