Accendra Health Inc (ACH)vsEDAP TMS SA (EDAP)
ACH
Accendra Health Inc
$2.70
+1.89%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $217.50M
EDAP
EDAP TMS SA
$4.31
+0.23%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $156.30M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Accendra Health Inc generates 3567% more annual revenue ($2.72B vs $74.07M). ACH leads profitability with a -39.8% profit margin vs -41.7%. ACH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.70. ACH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).
ACH
Hold44
out of 100
Grade: D
EDAP
Avoid25
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+71.5%
Fair Value
$8.34
Current Price
$2.70
$5.64 discount
Margin of Safety
+41.7%
Fair Value
$8.41
Current Price
$4.31
$4.10 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
No standout strengths identified
Areas to Watch
0.0% earnings growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -198.4% — below average capital efficiency
Trading at 8.3x book value
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of -124.0% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ACH
The strongest argument for ACH centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.70 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : EDAP
Revenue growth of 13.9% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ACH
The primary concerns for ACH are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : EDAP
The primary concerns for EDAP are Price/Book, Market Cap, PEG Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ACH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.
EDAP is growing revenue faster at 13.9% — sustainability is the question.
EDAP generates stronger free cash flow (-4M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
ACH scores higher overall (44/100 vs 25/100). EDAP offers better value entry with a 41.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Accendra Health Inc
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
Aluminum Corporation of China Limited, manufactures and sells alumina, primary aluminum and energy products in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Beijing, the People's Republic of China.
EDAP TMS SA
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA
EDAP TMS SA, develops, produces, markets, distributes and maintains a portfolio of minimally invasive medical devices for the treatment of urological diseases in Asia, France, the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lyon, France.
Compare with Other MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?