WallStSmart

Aecom Technology Corporation (ACM)vsFerrovial SE (FER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Aecom Technology Corporation generates 66% more annual revenue ($15.99B vs $9.63B). FER leads profitability with a 9.2% profit margin vs 3.2%. ACM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.71. ACM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ACM

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.73

FER

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.94
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACMSignificantly Overvalued (-65.9%)

Margin of Safety

-65.9%

Fair Value

$60.80

Current Price

$71.14

$10.34 premium

UndervaluedFair: $60.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FER.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACM4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
22.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.718/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
14.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

EPS GrowthGrowth
28.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 28.5% YoY

FER1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.43B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

ACM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.734/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.473/10

Elevated debt levels

FER4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
5.192/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
49.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.6%2/10

Earnings declined 87.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.942/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACM

The strongest argument for ACM centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.71 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : FER

The strongest argument for FER centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : ACM

The primary concerns for ACM are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : FER

The primary concerns for FER are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth. A P/E of 49.6x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACM carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

FER is growing revenue faster at 5.7% — sustainability is the question.

FER generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ACM scores higher overall (64/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Aecom Technology Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

AECOM provides professional construction and program management services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Visit Website →

Ferrovial SE

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Ferrovial SE, engages in the development, construction, and operation of highways and airports in the United States, Poland, Spain, the United Kingdom, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?