WallStSmart

Acme United Corporation (ACU)vsKimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kimberly-Clark Corporation generates 8268% more annual revenue ($16.45B vs $196.54M). KMB leads profitability with a 12.3% profit margin vs 5.2%. ACU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. ACU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

ACU

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.5Value: 9.3Quality: 5.0

KMB

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.19
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ACUUndervalued (+19.5%)

Margin of Safety

+19.5%

Fair Value

$54.38

Current Price

$44.43

$9.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $54.38Overvalued
KMBUndervalued (+9.3%)

Margin of Safety

+9.3%

Fair Value

$118.58

Current Price

$99.36

$19.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $118.58Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ACU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
17.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

KMB1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
126.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 127 in profit

Areas to Watch

ACU4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$165.31M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
5.2%3/10

5.2% margin — thin

KMB4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.892/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
21.9x2/10

Trading at 21.9x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.6%2/10

Revenue declined 0.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ACU

The strongest argument for ACU centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.

Bull Case : KMB

The strongest argument for KMB centers on Return on Equity.

Bear Case : ACU

The primary concerns for ACU are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : KMB

The primary concerns for KMB are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 4.77 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ACU profiles as a value stock while KMB is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ACU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.69 — expect wider price swings.

ACU is growing revenue faster at 3.4% — sustainability is the question.

KMB generates stronger free cash flow (575M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ACU scores higher overall (53/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Acme United Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Acme United Corporation supplies cutting, measuring, first aid, sharpening and safety products for the school, home, office, hardware, sporting goods and industrial markets in the United States, Canada, Europe and Asia. The company is headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?