WallStSmart

Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 205% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $16.56B). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 12.8%. KMB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.97. KMB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

KMB

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.19

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMBSignificantly Overvalued (-18.9%)

Margin of Safety

-18.9%

Fair Value

$90.46

Current Price

$97.67

$7.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $90.46Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMB1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
111.7%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 112 in profit

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$128.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KMB4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.974/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
18.1x4/10

Trading at 18.1x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
11.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMB

The strongest argument for KMB centers on Return on Equity.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : KMB

The primary concerns for KMB are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.77 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KMB profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

UL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

KMB is growing revenue faster at 2.7% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMB scores higher overall (63/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kimberly-Clark Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Kimberly-Clark Corporation is an American multinational personal care corporation that produces mostly paper-based consumer products. The company manufactures sanitary paper products and surgical & medical instruments. Kimberly-Clark brand name products include Kleenex facial tissue, Kotex feminine hygiene products, Cottonelle, Scott and Andrex toilet paper, Wypall utility wipes, KimWipes scientific cleaning wipes and Huggies disposable diapers and baby wipes.

Visit Website →

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?