WallStSmart

The AES Corporation (AES)vsUNITIL Corporation (UTL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

The AES Corporation generates 2045% more annual revenue ($12.49B vs $582.10M). AES leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs 9.6%. AES appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.09. AES earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 71/100 (B).

AES

Strong Buy

71

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.48

UTL

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.68
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AESSignificantly Overvalued (-44.1%)

Margin of Safety

-44.1%

Fair Value

$11.41

Current Price

$14.67

$3.26 premium

UndervaluedFair: $11.41Overvalued
UTLOvervalued (-13.5%)

Margin of Safety

-13.5%

Fair Value

$44.93

Current Price

$51.30

$6.37 premium

UndervaluedFair: $44.93Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AES4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
951.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 951.0% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UTL4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
16.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
26.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.0%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
27.0%8/10

Revenue surging 27.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AES4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-565.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
7.011/10

Elevated debt levels

UTL4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$922.03M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.473/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.372/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AES

The strongest argument for AES centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.09 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : UTL

The strongest argument for UTL centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Revenue growth of 27.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AES

The primary concerns for AES are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 7.01 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : UTL

The primary concerns for UTL are Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AES profiles as a value stock while UTL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

AES carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

UTL is growing revenue faster at 27.0% — sustainability is the question.

UTL generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

AES scores higher overall (71/100 vs 60/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

The AES Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

The AES Corporation is a Fortune 500 company that generates and distributes electrical power. AES is headquartered in Arlington, Virginia.

Visit Website →

UNITIL Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Unitil Corporation, a utility holding company, is engaged in the distribution of electricity and natural gas. The company is headquartered in Hampton, New Hampshire.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?