AGCO Corporation (AGCO)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)
AGCO
AGCO Corporation
$102.16
-1.20%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $7.15B
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
$116.09
-0.27%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $53.36B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
AGCO Corporation generates 32% more annual revenue ($10.35B vs $7.83B). TRI leads profitability with a 21.2% profit margin vs 5.2%. AGCO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.82. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
AGCO
Buy56
out of 100
Grade: C
TRI
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for AGCO.
Margin of Safety
-46.0%
Fair Value
$61.08
Current Price
$116.09
$55.01 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%
Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
5.2% margin — thin
Revenue declined 1.0%
Earnings declined 74.4%
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : AGCO
The strongest argument for AGCO centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : TRI
The strongest argument for TRI centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.2% and operating margin at 28.3%. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : AGCO
The primary concerns for AGCO are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : TRI
The primary concerns for TRI are P/E Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
AGCO profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
AGCO carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.
TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
TRI generates stronger free cash flow (722M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TRI scores higher overall (65/100 vs 56/100), backed by strong 21.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
AGCO Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA
AGCO Corporation manufactures and distributes agricultural equipment and related spare parts worldwide. The company is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.
Visit Website →Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA
Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.
Compare with Other FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?