Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
$145.85
-1.30%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $9.49B
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
$97.35
+1.71%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $45.78B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Oshkosh Corporation generates 35% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $7.83B). TRI leads profitability with a 21.2% profit margin vs 5.2%. TRI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.59. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).
OSK
Hold50
out of 100
Grade: D+
TRI
Buy63
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.
Margin of Safety
-47.1%
Fair Value
$60.64
Current Price
$97.35
$36.71 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%
Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
5.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 7.6%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : OSK
The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : TRI
The strongest argument for TRI centers on Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.2% and operating margin at 28.3%.
Bear Case : OSK
The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : TRI
The primary concerns for TRI are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
OSK profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
TRI generates stronger free cash flow (722M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TRI scores higher overall (63/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 21.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Oshkosh Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA
Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA
Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.
Compare with Other FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?