Oshkosh Corporation (OSK)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)
OSK
Oshkosh Corporation
$137.93
+2.79%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $7.84B
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
$116.09
-0.27%
INDUSTRIALS · Cap: $53.36B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Oshkosh Corporation generates 35% more annual revenue ($10.61B vs $7.83B). TRI leads profitability with a 21.2% profit margin vs 5.2%. TRI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.22. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
OSK
Buy52
out of 100
Grade: C-
TRI
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for OSK.
Margin of Safety
-46.0%
Fair Value
$61.08
Current Price
$116.09
$55.01 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Strong operational efficiency at 28.3%
Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
5.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 7.6%
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : OSK
The strongest argument for OSK centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.
Bull Case : TRI
The strongest argument for TRI centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 21.2% and operating margin at 28.3%. PEG of 1.22 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : OSK
The primary concerns for OSK are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : TRI
The primary concerns for TRI are P/E Ratio.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
OSK profiles as a value stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.
TRI is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.
TRI generates stronger free cash flow (722M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
TRI scores higher overall (65/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 21.2% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Oshkosh Corporation
INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA
Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.
Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares
INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA
Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.
Compare with Other FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?