WallStSmart

Adecoagro SA (AGRO)vsEdible Garden AG Inc (EDBL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Adecoagro SA generates 11073% more annual revenue ($1.50B vs $13.43M). AGRO leads profitability with a 0.9% profit margin vs -131.6%. AGRO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

AGRO

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.87

EDBL

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -5.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AGROUndervalued (+32.6%)

Margin of Safety

+32.6%

Fair Value

$13.27

Current Price

$11.42

$1.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $13.27Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EDBL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AGRO3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
55.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 55.6% YoY

Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.5%8/10

Revenue surging 22.5% year-over-year

EDBL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
22.9%8/10

Revenue surging 22.9% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

AGRO4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.82B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
0.8%3/10

ROE of 0.8% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
0.4%3/10

Operating margin of 0.4%

EDBL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.82M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-328.8%2/10

ROE of -328.8% — below average capital efficiency

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AGRO

The strongest argument for AGRO centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : EDBL

The strongest argument for EDBL centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AGRO

The primary concerns for AGRO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 629.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : EDBL

The primary concerns for EDBL are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EDBL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

EDBL is growing revenue faster at 22.9% — sustainability is the question.

EDBL generates stronger free cash flow (147,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FARM PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

AGRO scores higher overall (49/100 vs 31/100) and 22.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Adecoagro SA

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · FARM PRODUCTS · USA

Adecoagro SA is an agro-industrial company in South America. The company is headquartered in Luxembourg, Luxembourg.

Edible Garden AG Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · FARM PRODUCTS · USA

Edible Garden AG Incorporated and its subsidiaries operate as a controlled environment agricultural company. The company is headquartered in Belvidere, New Jersey.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?