WallStSmart

AKA Brands Holding Corp (AKA)vsUrban Outfitters Inc (URBN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Urban Outfitters Inc generates 947% more annual revenue ($6.32B vs $603.56M). URBN leads profitability with a 7.5% profit margin vs -4.4%. URBN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

AKA

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.47

URBN

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 6.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 3.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAOvervalued (-9.4%)

Margin of Safety

-9.4%

Fair Value

$9.83

Current Price

$10.56

$0.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.83Overvalued
URBNUndervalued (+1.6%)

Margin of Safety

+1.6%

Fair Value

$71.70

Current Price

$78.79

$7.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $71.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

URBN3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
14.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AKA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$119.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.7%3/10

Operating margin of 0.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-32.0%2/10

ROE of -32.0% — below average capital efficiency

URBN2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.5%3/10

7.5% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-177.76M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKA

The strongest argument for AKA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : URBN

The strongest argument for URBN centers on Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.47 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : AKA

The primary concerns for AKA are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.26 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : URBN

The primary concerns for URBN are Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AKA profiles as a turnaround stock while URBN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

AKA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.40 — expect wider price swings.

URBN is growing revenue faster at 11.4% — sustainability is the question.

AKA generates stronger free cash flow (18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

URBN scores higher overall (63/100 vs 32/100) and 11.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AKA Brands Holding Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

also known as Brands Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Urban Outfitters Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Urban Outfitters, Inc. is engaged in the retail and wholesale of general consumer products. The company is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?