WallStSmart

AKA Brands Holding Corp (AKA)vsRoss Stores Inc (ROST)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ross Stores Inc generates 3961% more annual revenue ($24.51B vs $603.56M). ROST leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs -4.4%. ROST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

AKA

Avoid

32

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.47

ROST

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.11
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AKAOvervalued (-9.9%)

Margin of Safety

-9.9%

Fair Value

$9.78

Current Price

$10.76

$0.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.78Overvalued
ROSTFair Value (-4.7%)

Margin of Safety

-4.7%

Fair Value

$183.87

Current Price

$222.41

$38.54 premium

UndervaluedFair: $183.87Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AKA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

ROST4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
39.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 39 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
70.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 70.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$71.92B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

AKA4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$117.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.7%3/10

Operating margin of 0.7%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-32.0%2/10

ROE of -32.0% — below average capital efficiency

ROST3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.494/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
10.5x4/10

Trading at 10.5x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AKA

The strongest argument for AKA centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : ROST

The strongest argument for ROST centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AKA

The primary concerns for AKA are Market Cap, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.26 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : ROST

The primary concerns for ROST are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AKA profiles as a turnaround stock while ROST is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

AKA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.38 — expect wider price swings.

ROST is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.

ROST generates stronger free cash flow (624M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ROST scores higher overall (64/100 vs 32/100) and 13.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AKA Brands Holding Corp

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

also known as Brands Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Ross Stores Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Ross Stores, Inc., operating under the brand name Ross Dress for Less, is an American chain of discount department stores headquartered in Dublin, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?