WallStSmart

Aramark Holdings (ARMK)vsLegalZoom.com Inc (LZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Aramark Holdings generates 2404% more annual revenue ($19.85B vs $792.49M). LZ leads profitability with a 2.1% profit margin vs 1.9%. ARMK trades at a lower P/E of 40.3x. ARMK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ARMK

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.82

LZ

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ARMKSignificantly Overvalued (-44.8%)

Margin of Safety

-44.8%

Fair Value

$39.30

Current Price

$58.55

$19.25 premium

UndervaluedFair: $39.30Overvalued
LZUndervalued (+27.4%)

Margin of Safety

+27.4%

Fair Value

$9.79

Current Price

$6.05

$3.74 discount

UndervaluedFair: $9.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ARMK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.888/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
33.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 33.3% YoY

LZ1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.129/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

ARMK4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

1.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.4%3/10

Operating margin of 4.4%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.913/10

Elevated debt levels

LZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$1.03B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

P/E RatioValuation
66.9x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ARMK

The strongest argument for ARMK centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.88 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LZ

The strongest argument for LZ centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : ARMK

The primary concerns for ARMK are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. A P/E of 40.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Debt-to-equity of 1.91 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : LZ

The primary concerns for LZ are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 66.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.26 — expect wider price swings.

ARMK is growing revenue faster at 9.3% — sustainability is the question.

LZ generates stronger free cash flow (34M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ARMK scores higher overall (64/100 vs 37/100). LZ offers better value entry with a 27.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Aramark Holdings

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Aramark provides uniform food, facilities, and services to education, health, business and industrial, sports, recreation, and correctional clients in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

LegalZoom.com Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

LegalZoom.com, Inc. operates an online platform for legal and compliance solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?