WallStSmart

LegalZoom.com Inc (LZ)vsThomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares (TRI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares generates 889% more annual revenue ($7.48B vs $756.04M). TRI leads profitability with a 20.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. TRI trades at a lower P/E of 26.6x. TRI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

LZ

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.0Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -1.72

TRI

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LZSignificantly Overvalued (-1216.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1216.7%

Fair Value

$0.54

Current Price

$5.93

$5.39 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.54Overvalued
TRISignificantly Overvalued (-298.8%)

Margin of Safety

-298.8%

Fair Value

$22.37

Current Price

$87.40

$65.03 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.37Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LZ1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
17.7%8/10

17.7% revenue growth

TRI2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
20.1%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.6%

Areas to Watch

LZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.06B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
74.8x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.9%2/10

Earnings declined 57.9%

TRI3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

PEG RatioValuation
9.702/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-42.6%2/10

Earnings declined 42.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LZ

The strongest argument for LZ centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 17.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TRI

The strongest argument for TRI centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.1% and operating margin at 26.6%.

Bear Case : LZ

The primary concerns for LZ are Market Cap, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 74.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TRI

The primary concerns for TRI are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LZ profiles as a growth stock while TRI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

LZ carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

LZ is growing revenue faster at 17.7% — sustainability is the question.

TRI generates stronger free cash flow (607M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRI scores higher overall (49/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 20.1% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

LegalZoom.com Inc

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

LegalZoom.com, Inc. operates an online platform for legal and compliance solutions in the United States. The company is headquartered in Glendale, California.

Thomson Reuters Corporation Common Shares

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY BUSINESS SERVICES · USA

Thomson Reuters Corporation provides business information services in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?