WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsHafnia Limited (HAFN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Hafnia Limited generates 616% more annual revenue ($2.22B vs $310.20M). HAFN leads profitability with a 13.9% profit margin vs 13.2%. HAFN trades at a lower P/E of 11.9x. ASC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

ASC

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

HAFN

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.5Value: 5.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+67.0%)

Margin of Safety

+67.0%

Fair Value

$41.18

Current Price

$15.90

$25.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $41.18Overvalued
HAFNSignificantly Overvalued (-59.8%)

Margin of Safety

-59.8%

Fair Value

$4.15

Current Price

$7.47

$3.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.15Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
80.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 80.7% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.209/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

HAFN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ASC4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$596.72M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

HAFN3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Revenue declined 18.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-57.1%2/10

Earnings declined 57.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : HAFN

The strongest argument for HAFN centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : HAFN

The primary concerns for HAFN are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ASC profiles as a value stock while HAFN is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

ASC carries more volatility with a beta of -0.21 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.

HAFN generates stronger free cash flow (113M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ASC scores higher overall (61/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

Hafnia Limited

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Hafnia Limited owns and operates oil product tankers in Bermuda. The company is headquartered in Hamilton, Bermuda.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?