WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd generates 1648% more annual revenue ($6.44B vs $368.29M). ASC leads profitability with a 29.7% profit margin vs 2.1%. ASC trades at a lower P/E of 7.3x. ASC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

ASC

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 8.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

ZIM

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+44.1%)

Margin of Safety

+44.1%

Fair Value

$24.30

Current Price

$18.67

$5.63 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.30Overvalued
ZIMSignificantly Overvalued (-19.6%)

Margin of Safety

-19.6%

Fair Value

$17.67

Current Price

$29.57

$11.90 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.67Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC6 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
42.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.8%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
61.3%10/10

Revenue surging 61.3% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
573.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 573.0% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0510/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

ZIM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
178.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 178.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

ASC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$762.70M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.624/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
2.5%3/10

ROE of 2.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.7% and operating margin at 42.8%. Revenue growth of 61.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ASC profiles as a growth stock while ZIM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 61.3% — sustainability is the question.

ZIM generates stronger free cash flow (286M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ASC scores higher overall (76/100 vs 54/100), backed by strong 29.7% margins and 61.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?