WallStSmart

Ardmore Shpng (ASC)vsZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd (ZIM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd generates 1842% more annual revenue ($6.29B vs $324.12M). ASC leads profitability with a 18.0% profit margin vs 1.6%. ASC trades at a lower P/E of 12.1x. ASC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

ASC

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.52

ZIM

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ASCUndervalued (+37.5%)

Margin of Safety

+37.5%

Fair Value

$21.72

Current Price

$16.44

$5.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $21.72Overvalued
ZIMSignificantly Overvalued (-22.8%)

Margin of Safety

-22.8%

Fair Value

$17.22

Current Price

$25.24

$8.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ASC6 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
316.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 316.4% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
12.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
29.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.1%

ZIM1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

ASC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$651.62M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

ZIM4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.6x4/10

Moderate valuation

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
2.5%3/10

ROE of 2.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

1.6% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ASC

The strongest argument for ASC centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.0% and operating margin at 29.1%. Revenue growth of 18.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : ZIM

The strongest argument for ZIM centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : ASC

The primary concerns for ASC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : ZIM

The primary concerns for ZIM are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 1.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ASC profiles as a growth stock while ZIM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

ZIM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

ASC is growing revenue faster at 18.8% — sustainability is the question.

ZIM generates stronger free cash flow (231M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

ASC scores higher overall (64/100 vs 39/100), backed by strong 18.0% margins and 18.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Ardmore Shpng

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

Ardmore Shipping Corporation is engaged in the global shipping of chemicals and petroleum products. The company is headquartered in Pembroke, Bermuda.

Visit Website →

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd

INDUSTRIALS · MARINE SHIPPING · USA

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd., provides container shipping and related services in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Haifa, Israel.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?