WallStSmart

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 567% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $4.92B). ATO leads profitability with a 28.5% profit margin vs 16.0%. ATO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.07. ATO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

ATO

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.10

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for ATO.

DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-89.7%)

Margin of Safety

-89.7%

Fair Value

$67.36

Current Price

$128.77

$61.41 premium

UndervaluedFair: $67.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ATO4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
37.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.2%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.5%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.3% YoY

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$99.33B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Areas to Watch

ATO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.074/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-399.43M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.374/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.693/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ATO

The strongest argument for ATO centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.5% and operating margin at 37.2%.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bear Case : ATO

The primary concerns for ATO are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ATO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.55 — expect wider price swings.

ATO is growing revenue faster at 4.8% — sustainability is the question.

ATO generates stronger free cash flow (-399M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ATO scores higher overall (66/100 vs 63/100), backed by strong 28.5% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Atmos Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?