WallStSmart

Black Hills Corporation (BKH)vsDuke Energy Corporation (DUK)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Duke Energy Corporation generates 1305% more annual revenue ($32.80B vs $2.34B). DUK leads profitability with a 16.0% profit margin vs 13.5%. BKH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.02. BKH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

BKH

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.92

DUK

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BKHUndervalued (+2.2%)

Margin of Safety

+2.2%

Fair Value

$74.26

Current Price

$87.53

$13.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $74.26Overvalued
DUKSignificantly Overvalued (-89.7%)

Margin of Safety

-89.7%

Fair Value

$67.36

Current Price

$128.77

$61.41 premium

UndervaluedFair: $67.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BKH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
58.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.5% YoY

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.0%

DUK3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$99.33B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Areas to Watch

BKH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.3%3/10

ROE of 7.3% — below average capital efficiency

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

DUK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.374/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.1%4/10

1.1% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.693/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BKH

The strongest argument for BKH centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : DUK

The strongest argument for DUK centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.0% and operating margin at 27.5%.

Bear Case : BKH

The primary concerns for BKH are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : DUK

The primary concerns for DUK are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 1.69 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BKH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.62 — expect wider price swings.

BKH is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

BKH generates stronger free cash flow (-314M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

BKH scores higher overall (65/100 vs 63/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Black Hills Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Black Hills Corporation is a natural gas and electric utility company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Rapid City, South Dakota.

Duke Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Duke Energy Corporation is an American electric power and natural gas holding company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?