WallStSmart

Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)vsMDU Resources Group Inc (MDU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Atmos Energy Corporation generates 169% more annual revenue ($4.92B vs $1.83B). ATO leads profitability with a 28.5% profit margin vs 10.7%. ATO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.02. ATO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

ATO

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.10

MDU

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.89

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

ATO4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
37.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 37.2%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.5%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 23.3% YoY

MDU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
47.2%8/10

Earnings expanding 47.2% YoY

Areas to Watch

ATO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.024/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-399.43M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MDU4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.364/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.892/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : ATO

The strongest argument for ATO centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.5% and operating margin at 37.2%.

Bull Case : MDU

The strongest argument for MDU centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : ATO

The primary concerns for ATO are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MDU

The primary concerns for MDU are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

ATO carries more volatility with a beta of 0.59 — expect wider price swings.

MDU is growing revenue faster at 6.9% — sustainability is the question.

MDU generates stronger free cash flow (72M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

ATO scores higher overall (66/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 28.5% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Atmos Energy Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is one of the United States' largest natural-gas-only distributors.

MDU Resources Group Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

MDU Resources Group, Inc. is involved in the regulated power supply and construction materials and services businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Bismarck, North Dakota.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?