WallStSmart

AMREP Corporation (AXR)vsForestar Group Inc (FOR)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 4102% more annual revenue ($1.72B vs $41.05M). AXR leads profitability with a 14.3% profit margin vs 9.9%. AXR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.55. FOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

AXR

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 14.90

FOR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.99
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for AXR.

FORUndervalued (+69.5%)

Margin of Safety

+69.5%

Fair Value

$96.88

Current Price

$25.92

$70.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $96.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AXR4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
14.9010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
18.0x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

AXR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.554/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Market CapQuality
$104.26M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-66.1%2/10

Revenue declined 66.1%

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$1.31B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AXR

The strongest argument for AXR centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : AXR

The primary concerns for AXR are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AXR profiles as a declining stock while FOR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.40 — expect wider price swings.

FOR is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FOR generates stronger free cash flow (32M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FOR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AMREP Corporation

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

AMREP Corporation is primarily engaged in the real estate business. The company is headquartered in Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?