WallStSmart

Forestar Group Inc (FOR)vsFive Point Holdings LLC (FPH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Forestar Group Inc generates 769% more annual revenue ($1.69B vs $193.90M). FPH leads profitability with a 48.6% profit margin vs 9.9%. FPH trades at a lower P/E of 4.8x. FPH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FOR

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 5.0

FPH

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 8.3Quality: 6.8
Piotroski: 1/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FORSignificantly Overvalued (-32.7%)

Margin of Safety

-32.7%

Fair Value

$22.24

Current Price

$25.32

$3.08 premium

UndervaluedFair: $22.24Overvalued
FPHUndervalued (+91.3%)

Margin of Safety

+91.3%

Fair Value

$60.84

Current Price

$4.93

$55.91 discount

UndervaluedFair: $60.84Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FOR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

FPH3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
4.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
48.6%10/10

Keeps 49 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Areas to Watch

FOR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$1.29B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

PEG RatioValuation
4.902/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-6.3%2/10

Earnings declined 6.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-157.10M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

FPH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
3.2%4/10

3.2% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$918.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.7%2/10

Revenue declined 20.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FOR

The strongest argument for FOR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : FPH

The strongest argument for FPH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 48.6% and operating margin at -58.5%.

Bear Case : FOR

The primary concerns for FOR are Market Cap, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : FPH

The primary concerns for FPH are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FOR profiles as a value stock while FPH is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FOR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.41 — expect wider price swings.

FOR is growing revenue faster at 9.0% — sustainability is the question.

FPH generates stronger free cash flow (80M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FPH scores higher overall (52/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 48.6% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Forestar Group Inc

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Forestar Group Inc. is a residential lot development company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Arlington, Texas.

Five Point Holdings LLC

REAL ESTATE · REAL ESTATE - DEVELOPMENT · USA

Five Point Holdings, LLC, through its subsidiary, Five Point Operating Company, LP, designs and develops planned and mixed-use communities in Orange, Los Angeles and San Francisco counties. The company is headquartered in Irvine, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?