WallStSmart

AutoZone Inc (AZO)vsDana Inc (DAN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AutoZone Inc generates 94% more annual revenue ($19.29B vs $9.96B). DAN leads profitability with a 55.0% profit margin vs 12.8%. AZO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. DAN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

AZO

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.23

DAN

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

AZOSignificantly Overvalued (-284.5%)

Margin of Safety

-284.5%

Fair Value

$971.52

Current Price

$3386.14

$2414.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $971.52Overvalued
DANSignificantly Overvalued (-62.2%)

Margin of Safety

-62.2%

Fair Value

$20.59

Current Price

$33.66

$13.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $20.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

AZO2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-3.7310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$55.27B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

DAN3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
55.0%10/10

Keeps 55 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
110.0%10/10

Revenue surging 110.0% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
2205.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 2205.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

AZO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.3%2/10

Earnings declined 2.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.232/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

DAN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.3%3/10

ROE of 5.3% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

Operating margin of 3.9%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.852/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : AZO

The strongest argument for AZO centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap.

Bull Case : DAN

The strongest argument for DAN centers on Profit Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 55.0% and operating margin at 3.9%. Revenue growth of 110.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : AZO

The primary concerns for AZO are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : DAN

The primary concerns for DAN are Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 47.9x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

AZO profiles as a value stock while DAN is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

DAN carries more volatility with a beta of 2.16 — expect wider price swings.

DAN is growing revenue faster at 110.0% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor AUTO PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

DAN scores higher overall (50/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 55.0% margins and 110.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

AutoZone Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

AutoZone, Inc. is an American retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, the largest in the United States.

Visit Website →

Dana Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Dana Incorporated provides energy management and energy transportation solutions for vehicles and machinery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?