WallStSmart

Dana Inc (DAN)vsMagna International Inc (MGA)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Magna International Inc generates 448% more annual revenue ($42.67B vs $7.78B). DAN leads profitability with a 13.5% profit margin vs 1.8%. MGA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.36. MGA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

DAN

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.25

MGA

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 8.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

DANSignificantly Overvalued (-80.8%)

Margin of Safety

-80.8%

Fair Value

$18.47

Current Price

$21.50

$3.03 premium

UndervaluedFair: $18.47Overvalued
MGAUndervalued (+46.6%)

Margin of Safety

+46.6%

Fair Value

$108.17

Current Price

$61.86

$46.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

DAN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MGA3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3610/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.8%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.8% YoY

Areas to Watch

DAN4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.852/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
-8.3%2/10

ROE of -8.3% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-77.6%2/10

Earnings declined 77.6%

MGA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
7.1%3/10

ROE of 7.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.8%3/10

1.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : DAN

The strongest argument for DAN centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : MGA

The strongest argument for MGA centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.36 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : DAN

The primary concerns for DAN are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MGA

The primary concerns for MGA are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 1.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

DAN carries more volatility with a beta of 2.03 — expect wider price swings.

DAN is growing revenue faster at 6.3% — sustainability is the question.

MGA generates stronger free cash flow (320M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor AUTO PARTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

MGA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Dana Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Dana Incorporated provides energy management and energy transportation solutions for vehicles and machinery in North America, Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Maumee, Ohio.

Magna International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO PARTS · USA

Magna International Inc. designs, designs and manufactures components, assemblies, systems, subsystems and modules for vehicle and light truck original equipment manufacturers worldwide. The company is headquartered in Aurora, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?