WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsChemours Co (CC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 827% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $5.82B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs -7.0%. CC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.60. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.24

CC

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 3.0Value: 3.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

CCSignificantly Overvalued (-20.3%)

Margin of Safety

-20.3%

Fair Value

$17.48

Current Price

$20.50

$3.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $17.48Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$230.71B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
40.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%

EPS GrowthGrowth
27.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.31B8/10

Generating 4.3B in free cash flow

CC0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

BHP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

CC4 concerns · Avg: 3.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
14.3x4/10

Trading at 14.3x book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.0%4/10

1.0% revenue growth

Operating MarginProfitability
3.0%3/10

Operating margin of 3.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : CC

CC has a balanced fundamental profile.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : CC

The primary concerns for CC are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 20.42 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a mature stock while CC is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

CC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.46 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BHP scores higher overall (62/100 vs 37/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

Chemours Co

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

The Chemours Company offers high performance chemicals in North America, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Wilmington, Delaware.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?