BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsCorteva Inc (CTVA)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$82.72
-6.83%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $230.71B
CTVA
Corteva Inc
$77.46
+1.71%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $51.88B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 202% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $17.89B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 6.5%. CTVA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.31. CTVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
BHP
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
CTVA
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.
Margin of Safety
-68.0%
Fair Value
$44.32
Current Price
$77.46
$33.14 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%
Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY
Generating 4.3B in free cash flow
Large-cap with strong market position
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 23.7%
Areas to Watch
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 4.8% — below average capital efficiency
6.5% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : CTVA
The strongest argument for CTVA centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.31 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : CTVA
The primary concerns for CTVA are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 41.9x leaves little room for execution misses.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a mature stock while CTVA is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
BHP carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.
CTVA is growing revenue faster at 11.0% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
CTVA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 62/100) and 11.0% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Corteva Inc
BASIC MATERIALS · AGRICULTURAL INPUTS · USA
Corteva, Inc. (also known as Corteva Agriscience) is a major American agricultural chemical and seed company that was the agricultural unit of DowDuPont prior to being spun off as an independent public company.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?