BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsEastman Chemical Company (EMN)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$79.30
+2.91%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $201.45B
EMN
Eastman Chemical Company
$70.42
-1.69%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $8.05B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 517% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $8.75B). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 5.4%. EMN appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.49. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
BHP
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
EMN
Hold46
out of 100
Grade: D+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-84.5%
Fair Value
$43.18
Current Price
$79.30
$36.12 premium
Margin of Safety
+16.4%
Fair Value
$97.26
Current Price
$70.42
$26.84 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY
Generating 4.3B in free cash flow
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency
5.4% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : EMN
The strongest argument for EMN centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : EMN
The primary concerns for EMN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a mature stock while EMN is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
EMN carries more volatility with a beta of 1.17 — expect wider price swings.
BHP is growing revenue faster at 10.8% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BHP scores higher overall (65/100 vs 46/100), backed by strong 19.0% margins and 10.8% revenue growth. EMN offers better value entry with a 16.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Eastman Chemical Company
BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA
Eastman Chemical Company is an American company primarily involved in the chemical industry. Once a subsidiary of Kodak, today it is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. The company is headquartered in Kingsport, Tennessee.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?