WallStSmart

BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsH B Fuller Company (FUL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

BHP Group Limited generates 1575% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $3.51B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 5.3%. FUL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.20. FUL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

BHP

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 9.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.34

FUL

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.94
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.

FULSignificantly Overvalued (-15.6%)

Margin of Safety

-15.6%

Fair Value

$57.89

Current Price

$51.60

$6.29 premium

UndervaluedFair: $57.89Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BHP5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$229.80B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
37.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
43.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Free Cash FlowQuality
$7.66B8/10

Generating 7.7B in free cash flow

FUL3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
61.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 61.8% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
15.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

BHP3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
5.952/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

FUL3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.944/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.3%3/10

5.3% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BHP

The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : FUL

The strongest argument for FUL centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : BHP

The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : FUL

The primary concerns for FUL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BHP profiles as a growth stock while FUL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FUL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.97 — expect wider price swings.

BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FUL scores higher overall (64/100 vs 57/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

BHP Group Limited

BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA

BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.

H B Fuller Company

BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA

HB Fuller Company formulates, manufactures and markets adhesives, sealants, coatings, polymers, tapes, encapsulants, additives and other specialty chemicals worldwide. The company is headquartered in Saint Paul, Minnesota.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?