BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsQuaker Chemical Corporation (KWR)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$86.27
-0.34%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $229.80B
KWR
Quaker Chemical Corporation
$154.42
-0.85%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $2.67B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 2875% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $1.98B). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 5.0%. KWR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.86. KWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
BHP
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
KWR
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.
Margin of Safety
-15.6%
Fair Value
$153.77
Current Price
$154.42
$0.65 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%
18.3% revenue growth
Generating 7.7B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 54.8% YoY
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 9.0%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 0.3% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : KWR
The strongest argument for KWR centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 10.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : KWR
The primary concerns for KWR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a growth stock while KWR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
KWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.
BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
KWR scores higher overall (62/100 vs 57/100) and 10.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Quaker Chemical Corporation
BASIC MATERIALS · SPECIALTY CHEMICALS · USA
Quaker Chemical Corporation develops, produces and markets a variety of specialty chemicals formulated for a wide range of heavy manufacturing and industrial applications. The company is headquartered in Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?