BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsSmith-Midland Corp (SMID)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$87.15
-0.23%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $229.80B
SMID
Smith-Midland Corp
$24.49
+1.07%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $138.08M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 65556% more annual revenue ($58.76B vs $89.50M). BHP leads profitability with a 16.7% profit margin vs 8.6%. SMID appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.20. BHP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).
BHP
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
SMID
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Intrinsic value data unavailable for BHP.
Margin of Safety
-60.0%
Fair Value
$21.10
Current Price
$24.49
$3.39 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 43.3%
18.3% revenue growth
Generating 7.7B in free cash flow
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 9.0%
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Revenue declined 10.8%
Earnings declined 66.9%
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.7% and operating margin at 43.3%. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SMID
The strongest argument for SMID centers on Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : SMID
The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a growth stock while SMID is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.
BHP is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (7.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
BHP scores higher overall (57/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 16.7% margins and 18.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Smith-Midland Corp
BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA
Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.
Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?