BHP Group Limited (BHP)vsSmith-Midland Corp (SMID)
BHP
BHP Group Limited
$79.30
+2.91%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $201.45B
SMID
Smith-Midland Corp
$33.78
+1.90%
BASIC MATERIALS · Cap: $176.71M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
BHP Group Limited generates 57675% more annual revenue ($53.99B vs $93.45M). BHP leads profitability with a 19.0% profit margin vs 13.4%. SMID appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.20. SMID earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).
BHP
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
SMID
Strong Buy69
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-84.5%
Fair Value
$43.18
Current Price
$79.30
$36.12 premium
Margin of Safety
+5.4%
Fair Value
$35.69
Current Price
$33.78
$1.91 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 40.7%
Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit
Earnings expanding 27.5% YoY
Generating 4.3B in free cash flow
Earnings expanding 52.6% YoY
Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Revenue surging 24.7% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BHP
The strongest argument for BHP centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.0% and operating margin at 40.7%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : SMID
The strongest argument for SMID centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 24.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.20 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : BHP
The primary concerns for BHP are PEG Ratio.
Bear Case : SMID
The primary concerns for SMID are Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
BHP profiles as a mature stock while SMID is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
SMID carries more volatility with a beta of 1.89 — expect wider price swings.
SMID is growing revenue faster at 24.7% — sustainability is the question.
BHP generates stronger free cash flow (4.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
SMID scores higher overall (69/100 vs 65/100) and 24.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
BHP Group Limited
BASIC MATERIALS · OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING · USA
BHP Group engages in the natural resources business in Australia, Europe, China, Japan, India, South Korea, the rest of Asia, North America, South America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
Smith-Midland Corp
BASIC MATERIALS · BUILDING MATERIALS · USA
Smith-Midland Corporation invents, develops, manufactures, markets, leases, licenses, sells, and installs precast concrete products primarily for use in the construction, highway, utility, and agricultural industries. The company is headquartered in Midland, Virginia.
Compare with Other OTHER INDUSTRIAL METALS & MINING Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?