Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
$31.13
+1.43%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $5.39B
WWW
Wolverine World Wide Inc
$19.93
+3.32%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.61B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Birkenstock Holding plc generates 16% more annual revenue ($2.27B vs $1.95B). BIRK leads profitability with a 14.8% profit margin vs 5.5%. BIRK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.96. BIRK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).
BIRK
Strong Buy65
out of 100
Grade: B-
WWW
Buy59
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-33.3%
Fair Value
$30.00
Current Price
$31.13
$1.13 premium
Margin of Safety
+36.9%
Fair Value
$28.26
Current Price
$19.93
$8.33 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 29.0%
Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Grey zone — moderate risk
Earnings declined 13.0%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
5.5% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : BIRK
The strongest argument for BIRK centers on PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 13.3% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.96 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WWW
The strongest argument for WWW centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.
Bear Case : BIRK
The primary concerns for BIRK are Altman Z-Score, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : WWW
The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.66 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
WWW carries more volatility with a beta of 1.73 — expect wider price swings.
BIRK is growing revenue faster at 13.3% — sustainability is the question.
BIRK generates stronger free cash flow (202M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
BIRK scores higher overall (65/100 vs 59/100) and 13.3% revenue growth. WWW offers better value entry with a 36.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Birkenstock Holding plc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Birkenstock Holding plc manufactures and sells footwear products. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.
Wolverine World Wide Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?