On Holding Ltd (ONON)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)
ONON
On Holding Ltd
$37.08
-1.04%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $12.72B
WWW
Wolverine World Wide Inc
$15.90
-0.19%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.44B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
On Holding Ltd generates 62% more annual revenue ($3.12B vs $1.92B). ONON leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs 5.4%. ONON appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. WWW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).
ONON
Strong Buy65
out of 100
Grade: B-
WWW
Buy65
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-25.6%
Fair Value
$36.05
Current Price
$37.08
$1.03 premium
Margin of Safety
+36.9%
Fair Value
$28.24
Current Price
$15.90
$12.34 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Earnings expanding 81.1% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 64.1% YoY
Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Expensive relative to growth rate
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
5.4% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ONON
The strongest argument for ONON centers on EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WWW
The strongest argument for WWW centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ONON
The primary concerns for ONON are P/E Ratio. A P/E of 40.6x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : WWW
The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.89 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ONON carries more volatility with a beta of 2.10 — expect wider price swings.
ONON is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.
ONON generates stronger free cash flow (7M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
ONON scores higher overall (65/100 vs 65/100) and 14.5% revenue growth. WWW offers better value entry with a 36.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
On Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
On Holding AG develops and distributes sports products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.
Wolverine World Wide Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?