On Holding Ltd (ONON)vsWolverine World Wide Inc (WWW)
ONON
On Holding Ltd
$35.16
-11.19%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $13.10B
WWW
Wolverine World Wide Inc
$16.86
-0.41%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $1.30B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
On Holding Ltd generates 61% more annual revenue ($3.01B vs $1.87B). ONON leads profitability with a 6.8% profit margin vs 5.1%. ONON appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.88. WWW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).
ONON
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
WWW
Buy61
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-754.5%
Fair Value
$5.30
Current Price
$35.16
$29.86 premium
Margin of Safety
+66.6%
Fair Value
$53.35
Current Price
$16.86
$36.49 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk
Growing faster than its price suggests
Revenue surging 22.6% year-over-year
Every $100 of equity generates 27 in profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY
Areas to Watch
6.8% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 24.0%
Expensive relative to growth rate
4.6% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
5.1% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ONON
The strongest argument for ONON centers on Altman Z-Score, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 22.6% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.88 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : WWW
The strongest argument for WWW centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.
Bear Case : ONON
The primary concerns for ONON are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 50.8x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : WWW
The primary concerns for WWW are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Market Cap.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ONON profiles as a growth stock while WWW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
ONON carries more volatility with a beta of 2.15 — expect wider price swings.
ONON is growing revenue faster at 22.6% — sustainability is the question.
WWW generates stronger free cash flow (146M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
WWW scores higher overall (61/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
On Holding Ltd
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
On Holding AG develops and distributes sports products worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.
Wolverine World Wide Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES · USA
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. designs, manufactures, supplies, markets, licenses, and distributes footwear, apparel, and accessories in the United States, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific, Canada, and Latin America. The company is headquartered in Rockford, Michigan.
Compare with Other FOOTWEAR & ACCESSORIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?