WallStSmart

Black Hills Corporation (BKH)vsChesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Black Hills Corporation generates 148% more annual revenue ($2.31B vs $930.00M). CPK leads profitability with a 15.1% profit margin vs 12.6%. CPK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.31. CPK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

BKH

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.0Value: 5.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.92

CPK

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.03
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BKHUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$87.12

Current Price

$74.31

$12.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $87.12Overvalued
CPKOvervalued (-13.6%)

Margin of Safety

-13.6%

Fair Value

$114.77

Current Price

$125.13

$10.36 premium

UndervaluedFair: $114.77Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BKH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
26.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.2%

CPK4 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
28.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 28.5%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.4%8/10

Revenue surging 20.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.1%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.1% YoY

Areas to Watch

BKH4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.9%4/10

0.9% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.732/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-101.50M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.922/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

CPK3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.314/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-178.50M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.032/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BKH

The strongest argument for BKH centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : CPK

The strongest argument for CPK centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.1% and operating margin at 28.5%. Revenue growth of 20.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : BKH

The primary concerns for BKH are EPS Growth, PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CPK

The primary concerns for CPK are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BKH profiles as a value stock while CPK is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CPK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

CPK is growing revenue faster at 20.4% — sustainability is the question.

BKH generates stronger free cash flow (-102M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CPK scores higher overall (69/100 vs 57/100), backed by strong 15.1% margins and 20.4% revenue growth. BKH offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Black Hills Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Black Hills Corporation is a natural gas and electric utility company in the United States. The company is headquartered in Rapid City, South Dakota.

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA

Chesapeake Utilities Corporation is a power supply company. The company is headquartered in Dover, Delaware.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?