WallStSmart

Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc (BR)vsGDS Holdings Ltd (GDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

GDS Holdings Ltd generates 64% more annual revenue ($12.26B vs $7.48B). GDS leads profitability with a 30.5% profit margin vs 15.0%. BR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.01. GDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 69/100 (B-).

BR

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 6/9

GDS

Strong Buy

69

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BRSignificantly Overvalued (-20.1%)

Margin of Safety

-20.1%

Fair Value

$139.57

Current Price

$167.74

$28.17 premium

UndervaluedFair: $139.57Overvalued
GDSUndervalued (+17.0%)

Margin of Safety

+17.0%

Fair Value

$55.98

Current Price

$30.82

$25.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $55.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BR3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Return on EquityProfitability
39.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
24.6%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.6%

GDS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
30.5%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
207.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 207.0% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
13.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

BR2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Debt/EquityHealth
1.243/10

Elevated debt levels

GDS3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
1.463/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
7.242/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.652/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BR

The strongest argument for BR centers on Return on Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : GDS

The strongest argument for GDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 30.5% and operating margin at 14.2%.

Bear Case : BR

The primary concerns for BR are PEG Ratio, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : GDS

The primary concerns for GDS are Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BR profiles as a value stock while GDS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.91 — expect wider price swings.

BR is growing revenue faster at 7.5% — sustainability is the question.

BR generates stronger free cash flow (679M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GDS scores higher overall (69/100 vs 62/100), backed by strong 30.5% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Broadridge Financial Solutions Inc

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Broadridge Financial Solutions is a public corporate services company founded in 2007 as a spin-off from Automatic Data Processing. The main business of Broadridge is as a service provider supplying public companies with proxy statements, annual reports and other financial documents, and shareholder communications solutions, such as virtual annual meetings.

GDS Holdings Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · China

GDS Holdings Limited, develops and operates data centers in the People's Republic of China. The company is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?