WallStSmart

Cardinal Health Inc (CAH)vsNorthrop Grumman Corporation (NOC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Cardinal Health Inc generates 492% more annual revenue ($250.74B vs $42.37B). NOC leads profitability with a 10.8% profit margin vs 0.6%. CAH appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.25. NOC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

CAH

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 4.30

NOC

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 4.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.96
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAHUndervalued (+73.9%)

Margin of Safety

+73.9%

Fair Value

$859.62

Current Price

$183.65

$675.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $859.62Overvalued
NOCSignificantly Overvalued (-60.6%)

Margin of Safety

-60.6%

Fair Value

$422.70

Current Price

$549.52

$126.82 premium

UndervaluedFair: $422.70Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAH2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3010/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.68B8/10

Generating 1.7B in free cash flow

NOC4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
84.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 84.9% YoY

Market CapQuality
$78.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
28.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 29 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

CAH4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.6%3/10

0.6% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

Operating margin of 1.4%

NOC4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.4%4/10

4.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.964/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.183/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAH

The strongest argument for CAH centers on Altman Z-Score, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 11.0% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.25 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : NOC

The strongest argument for NOC centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : CAH

The primary concerns for CAH are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 0.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : NOC

The primary concerns for NOC are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.54 — expect wider price swings.

CAH is growing revenue faster at 11.0% — sustainability is the question.

CAH generates stronger free cash flow (1.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

NOC scores higher overall (63/100 vs 47/100). CAH offers better value entry with a 73.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Cardinal Health Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL DISTRIBUTION · USA

Cardinal Health, Inc. is an American multinational health care services company.

Visit Website →

Northrop Grumman Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE: NOC) is an American multinational aerospace and defense technology company.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?