WallStSmart

Caleres Inc (CAL)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 299% more annual revenue ($11.20B vs $2.81B). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.58. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CAL

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.99

LULU

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for CAL.

LULUUndervalued (+70.7%)

Margin of Safety

+70.7%

Fair Value

$600.18

Current Price

$114.23

$485.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $600.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAL3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
103.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 103.8% YoY

PEG RatioValuation
0.828/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CAL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Market CapQuality
$417.37M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

Operating margin of 3.3%

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.0%2/10

Earnings declined 35.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAL

The strongest argument for CAL centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.82 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CAL

The primary concerns for CAL are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.55 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 0.86 — expect wider price swings.

CAL is growing revenue faster at 8.5% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor APPAREL RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 63/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Caleres Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

Caleres, Inc. is engaged in the retail and wholesale of footwear in the United States, China, Canada, China, and Guam. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?