WallStSmart

CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 713% more annual revenue ($9.59B vs $1.18B). QSR leads profitability with a 10.0% profit margin vs 5.4%. QSR trades at a lower P/E of 24.1x. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CAVA

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.82

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAVASignificantly Overvalued (-62.0%)

Margin of Safety

-62.0%

Fair Value

$50.35

Current Price

$72.60

$22.25 premium

UndervaluedFair: $50.35Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+25.4%)

Margin of Safety

+25.4%

Fair Value

$94.75

Current Price

$72.66

$22.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAVA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.1%10/10

Revenue surging 32.1% year-over-year

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.0% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
25.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
25.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.9%

Areas to Watch

CAVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
10.4x4/10

Trading at 10.4x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.6%3/10

ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.4%3/10

5.4% margin — thin

QSR2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.191/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAVA

The strongest argument for CAVA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 32.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.28 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CAVA

The primary concerns for CAVA are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 139.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.19 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAVA profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CAVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.91 — expect wider price swings.

CAVA is growing revenue faster at 32.1% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (169M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 39/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CAVA Group, Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

CAVA Group, Inc. owns and operates a chain of Mediterranean restaurants. The company is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?