WallStSmart

CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 606% more annual revenue ($9.70B vs $1.37B). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs 4.8%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.24. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

CAVA

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.82

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAVAUndervalued (+1.1%)

Margin of Safety

+1.1%

Fair Value

$56.48

Current Price

$55.88

$0.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $56.48Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+25.1%)

Margin of Safety

+25.1%

Fair Value

$94.35

Current Price

$76.96

$17.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAVA1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
31.3%10/10

Revenue surging 31.3% year-over-year

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
151.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
27.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%

Areas to Watch

CAVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.824/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.6%3/10

ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

4.8% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.071/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAVA

The strongest argument for CAVA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 31.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CAVA

The primary concerns for CAVA are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 96.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAVA profiles as a hypergrowth stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CAVA carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.

CAVA is growing revenue faster at 31.3% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CAVA Group, Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

CAVA Group, Inc. owns and operates a chain of Mediterranean restaurants. The company is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia.

Visit Website →

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?