WallStSmart

CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)vsStarbucks Corporation (SBUX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Starbucks Corporation generates 3096% more annual revenue ($37.70B vs $1.18B). CAVA leads profitability with a 5.4% profit margin vs 3.6%. SBUX trades at a lower P/E of 78.0x. SBUX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 39/100 (F).

CAVA

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.98

SBUX

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.07
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CAVASignificantly Overvalued (-1735.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1735.7%

Fair Value

$3.67

Current Price

$80.29

$76.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $3.67Overvalued
SBUXSignificantly Overvalued (-1135.9%)

Margin of Safety

-1135.9%

Fair Value

$8.02

Current Price

$92.70

$84.68 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CAVA1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.9%8/10

Revenue surging 20.9% year-over-year

SBUX2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$104.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.27B8/10

Generating 1.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CAVA4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Price/BookValuation
12.0x4/10

Trading at 12.0x book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.984/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.4%3/10

5.4% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.4%3/10

Operating margin of 1.4%

SBUX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.534/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.6%3/10

3.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CAVA

The strongest argument for CAVA centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 20.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SBUX

The strongest argument for SBUX centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : CAVA

The primary concerns for CAVA are Price/Book, Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin. A P/E of 156.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SBUX

The primary concerns for SBUX are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 78.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CAVA profiles as a growth stock while SBUX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

CAVA carries more volatility with a beta of 2.18 — expect wider price swings.

CAVA is growing revenue faster at 20.9% — sustainability is the question.

SBUX generates stronger free cash flow (1.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SBUX scores higher overall (39/100 vs 34/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

CAVA Group, Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

CAVA Group, Inc. owns and operates a chain of Mediterranean restaurants. The company is headquartered in Washington, District of Columbia.

Visit Website →

Starbucks Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Starbucks Corporation is an American multinational chain of coffeehouses and roastery reserves headquartered in Seattle, Washington. As the world's largest coffeehouse chain, Starbucks is seen to be the main representation of the United States' second wave of coffee culture.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?